Sunday, December 28, 2014

Tapestry by Mary Chess c1934

Tapestry by Mary Chess: launched in 1934.




Fragrance Composition:


So what does it smell like? It is classified as an aldehydic floral musky chypre fragrance for women, although I have seen this classified as an oriental. There are no published notes on this perfume, so I am using a vintage 1950s perfume nip to finish this article. A delicately mixed floral bouquet blended with subtle woodsy notes and undertones of moss.
  • Top notes: aldehydes, bergamot, peach, geranium, lily of the valley and lemon
  • Middle notes: frangipani, orange blossom, violet, Bulgarian rose, jasmine and ylang ylang
  • Base notes: sandalwood, oakmoss, patchouli, vetiver, benzoin, musk, civet and ambergris

On my skin, it starts out with a very fresh citrus, peach and soapy aldehyde burst, then as it progresses into florals. I can detect Bulgarian rose, geranium and lily of the valley, giving way to a sweet jasmine, lush orange blossom, frangipani, candied violet and fruity ylang ylang heart. The base dries down to a dusty vetiver and sweetened sandalwood and balsamic benzoin, spiked with earthy patchouli and fuzzy oakmoss resting on an animalic base of musk, civet and ambergris. The sweetened florals and sandalwood hold strong for most of the perfume's life, pleasant but never gets cloying. there is a slight fecal note from the civet, just enough to give it a little skank towards the very end.

On paper, the perfume is divine, but smells fruitier and the frangipani note is intensified. The woodsy and animalic notes are muted and the oakmoss is not as strong.

Fate of the Fragrance:


Tapestry was discontinued for many years, but reformulated and relaunched as an eau de toilette in 1994 alongside Autere and Tuberose. However, Tapestry is again discontinued.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments will be subject to approval by a moderator. Comments may fail to be approved if the moderator deems that they:
--contain unsolicited advertisements ("spam")
--are unrelated to the subject matter of the post or of subsequent approved comments
--contain personal attacks or abusive/gratuitously offensive language

Welcome!

This is not your average perfume blog. In each post, I present perfumes or companies as encyclopedic entries with as much facts and photos as I can add for easy reading and researching without all the extraneous fluff or puffery.

Please understand that this website is not affiliated with any of the perfume companies written about here, it is only a source of reference. I consider it a repository of vital information for collectors and those who have enjoyed the classic fragrances of days gone by. Updates to posts are conducted whenever I find new information to add or to correct any errors.

One of the goals of this website is to show the present owners of the various perfumes and cologne brands that are featured here how much we miss the discontinued classics and hopefully, if they see that there is enough interest and demand, they will bring back these fragrances!

Please leave a comment below (for example: of why you liked the fragrance, describe the scent, time period or age you wore it, who gave it to you or what occasion, any specific memories, what it reminded you of, maybe a relative wore it, or you remembered seeing the bottle on their vanity table, did you like the bottle design), who knows, perhaps someone from the company brand might see it.

Also, if you have any information not seen here, please comment and share with all of us.

Featured Post

Faking Perfume Bottles to Increase Their Value

The issue of adding "after market" accents to rather plain perfume bottles to increase their value is not new to the world o...