Please understand that this website is not affiliated with any of the perfume companies written about here in any way, it is only a reference page and repository of information for collectors and those who have enjoyed the classic fragrances of days gone by.

One of the goals of this website is to show the present owners of the various perfumes and cologne brands that are featured here how much we miss the discontinued classics and hopefully, if they see that there is enough interest and demand, they will bring back these fragrances!

Please leave a comment below (for example: of why you liked the fragrance, describe the scent, time period or age you wore it, who gave it to you or what occasion, any specific memories, what it reminded you of, maybe a relative wore it, or you remembered seeing the bottle on their vanity table), who knows, perhaps someone from the company brand might see it.

Vintage Perfumes For Sale

Saturday, May 6, 2017

Daniel de Fasson by Daniel de Fasson c1990

Daniel de Fasson by Daniel de Fasson: launched in 1990 in association with Parlux SA. . Also known as Daniel de Fasson pour Femme.

Fragrance Composition:

So what does it smell like? It is classified as an oriental floral fragrance for women.

There are no published notes on this perfume anywhere so I am using a vintage sample that I have. At first smell, the scent reminds me of the original Poison perfume. The fragrance opens with a fruity top note of plum, grapes and raisins, a heart of lush white flowers and exotic dry spices, resting on a warm, amber base.

  • Top notes: plum, coriander, wild berries
  • Middle notes: spices, orange blossom, tuberose, rose, jasmine
  • Base notes: amber, sandalwood, musk, vanilla

Fate of the Fragrance:

Discontinued, date unknown.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments will be subject to approval by a moderator. Comments may fail to be approved or may be edited if the moderator deems that they:
contain unsolicited advertisements ("spam")
are unrelated to the subject matter of the post or of subsequent approved comments
contain personal attacks or abusive/gratuitously offensive language